Waiver Reviews and Violation Investigations
Case Summaries
Below are examples of the types of waiver reviews and violation
investigations conducted by the NRMP. They are intended to help match
participants understand the NRMP's policies and procedures and to highlight
relevant sections of Match Participation Agreements that govern the Specialties
Matching Service. These examples are illustrative only and are not meant
to be an exhaustive list of the types of reviews and investigations conducted
by the NRMP. Review the terms and conditions
of the Match Participation Agreement.
WAIVER:
I. Waiver Granted - Applicant
Description
After the 2009 Thoracic Surgery Fellowship Match, Dr. John Doe wrote to
the NRMP and requested a waiver of his match commitment to the National
Medical Center. Dr. Doe wanted to change his specialty to Vascular Surgery,
and he notified the NRMP of his intentions less than one month after the
release of the Match results. The NRMP initiated a waiver review and requested
information from the director of the fellowship program to which Dr. Doe
had matched and from his current residency program director. After reviewing
all pertinent information, the NRMP granted Dr. Doe a waiver of his match
commitment.
Policy
Sections 2.4 of the Specialties
Matching Service Match Participation Agreement states that the NRMP
may grant a waiver of the binding match commitment if an applicant has
elected to change specialties provided the waiver is requested no later
than the January 15 prior to the start of training. Once a party has
matched, a waiver may be obtained only from the NRMP; applicants and programs
are not authorized to release each other. Moreover, applicants may not
discuss, interview for, or accept a position in another program until
the NRMP has approved a waiver request. All waivers must be submitted
to the NRMP in writing, with a copy to the program to which the applicant
matched. The NRMP solicits information from all relevant parties prior
to deciding whether to grant the waiver. If the waiver is granted, the
applicant may accept a position in another program or participate in future
NRMP matches.
II. Waiver Granted - Program
Description
After the 2008 Medical Specialties Matching Program, the Cardiovascular
Disease program director at American General Hospital wrote to the NRMP
requesting a waiver of his program's match commitment to Dr. Ethel Murtz.
Dr. Murtz's visa application had been delayed, and she had asked the program
to postpone her start date of July 1, 2009 to allow additional time for
the application to be approved. The NRMP initiated a waiver review and
requested confirmation from Dr. Murtz regarding the status of her visa
application. Dr. Murtz confirmed that her application had been delayed,
and the NRMP granted the Gastroenterology program a waiver of its match
commitment.
Policy
Section 2.1 of the Specialties
Matching Service Match Participation Agreement states that an applicant
must meet all of the requirements for entry into graduate medication education
prior to the scheduled start date of the matched position. The requirements
include those imposed by the institution and program as well as those
prescribed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
("ACGME") in Section II of the ACGME Institutional Requirements,
Residents. Programs are not obligated to offer, nor will the NRMP require,
a delayed start date for training.
Section 3.3 authorizes
the NRMP to grant a waiver of the binding match commitment to a program
if honoring the match would cause serious and extreme hardship. Once a
party has matched, a waiver may be obtained only from the NRMP;
applicants and programs are not authorized to release each other. Moreover,
programs may not discuss, interview for, or offer the matched position
to another candidate prior to or during the course of a waiver investigation.
All waivers must be submitted to the NRMP in writing, with a copy to each
applicant named in the request. The NRMP solicits information from all
relevant parties prior to deciding whether to grant the waiver. If the
waiver is granted, the program may recruit another qualified candidate
for the vacant position.
Section 5.1 states that
a match commitment is subject to the official policies of the appointing
institution in effect on the date the program submits its rank order list
and is contingent upon the matching applicant meeting all eligibility
requirements imposed by those policies.
III. Waiver Denied- Applicant
Description
After the 2009 Pediatric Surgery Fellowship Match, Dr. Lucy McGilicutty
requested a waiver of her match commitment to the American Medical Institution.
During her residency training, she entered into a serious relationship
and now planned to be married. She did not want to be separated from her
fiancé for the duration of her fellowship. The NRMP denied Dr.
McGilicutty's request and informed her of her obligation to honor the
match commitment. When Dr. McGilicutty notified the NRMP that she would
not accept the matched position, the NRMP initiated a violation investigation
of her actions.
Policy
Section 2.4 of the
Specialties Matching Service Match Participation
Agreement authorizes the NRMP to grant a waiver of the binding match
commitment to an applicant if honoring the match would cause serious and
extreme hardship. If the NRMP denies the waiver request, the applicant
is expected to accept the matched position. If the applicant fails to
do so, the NRMP will initiate an investigation to determine whether the
applicant has violated the terms of the Agreement. Moreover, any applicant
whose waiver request is denied and who does not accept the matched position
may be barred from accepting a position in another NRMP match-participating
program for one year from the date of the NRMP's final decision to deny
the waiver. Any program that offers a position to that applicant to commence
training during the one-year period is in breach of the Agreement, and
the NRMP will initiate a violation investigation of that program.
Section 5.1 states
that the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order
list or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank
order list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment
if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a breach of the
Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
IV. Waiver Denied-Program
Description
After the 2009 Radiology Fellowship Match, the program director at American
Hospital wrote to the NRMP and requested a waiver of its match commitment
to Dr. Jane Doe. After Match Day, the program director obtained additional
information about Dr. Doe's residency training, and she no longer felt
comfortable offering Dr. Doe a position. The NRMP initiated a waiver review
and learned that Dr. Doe had no prior record of misconduct. Moreover,
the information obtained by the program had been available prior to the
certified rank order list deadline, when the
program could have deleted the applicant's name from its rank order list.
The NRMP denied the Abdominal Transplant Surgery program's request for
a waiver.
Policy
Section 5.1 states that
the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order list
or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank order
list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment
if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a breach of the
Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
VIOLATION:
I. Violation - Applicant
Description
In the 2008 Medical Specialties Matching Program (MSMP), Dr. Robert E.
Lee matched to the Hematology/Oncology program at National Medical Center
for a July 2009 start date. In May 2009, the NRMP learned from the program
director that Dr. Lee had not returned his confirmation letter and had
not responded to the program director's repeated requests for information
to complete the appointment process. The NRMP contacted Dr. Lee and informed
him of the NRMP's requirement to request a waiver of his match commitment
if he did not plan to honor his match. During the waiver review, the NRMP
learned that Dr. Lee was undecided about whether to accept the matched
position. He was completing a separate fellowship in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology,
and he was unsure whether he wished to pursue a career in that specialty.
The NRMP denied the waiver, noting that Dr. Lee could have withdrawn from
the 2008 MSMP prior to the rank order list deadline if he wished to pursue
a career in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, When Dr. Lee failed to honor
his match commitment, he was barred from NRMP match-participating programs
for one year, barred from future NRMP matches for two years, and flagged
as a match violator in the NRMP's Registration, Ranking, and Results (R3)
System for two years.
Policy
Section 2.3.1
of the Specialties Matching Services Match
Participation Agreement allows applicants to withdraw from the SMS
Matching Program under certain conditions prior to the applicable rank
order list certification deadline. Applicants who accept a concurrent
year position outside the SMS Matching Program or through any other national
matching service shall withdraw from the Matching Program. Withdrawal
from the SMS Matching Program must be completed prior to the rank order
list certification deadline. Failure to withdraw is a breach of the Agreement.
Applicants in the Matching Program also are prohibited from accepting
a position through any other national matching service or by agreement
outside the Matching Program after the rank order list certification deadline.
Section 2.4 states that
waiver requests for change of specialty must be submitted no later
than the January 15 prior to the start of training in the fellowship
program. If the NRMP denies the waiver request, the applicant is expected
to accept the matched position. If the applicant fails to do so, the NRMP
will initiate an investigation to determine whether the applicant has
violated the terms of the Agreement. Moreover, any applicant whose waiver
request is denied and who does not accept the matched position may be
barred from accepting a position in another NRMP match-participating program
for one year from the date of the NRMP's final decision to deny the waiver.
Any program that offers a position to that applicant to commence training
during the one-year period is in breach of the Agreement, and the NRMP
will initiate a violation investigation of that program.
Section 5.1 states that
the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order list
or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank order
list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment
if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a breach of the
Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
II. Violation - Applicant
Description
In the 2009 Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship Match, Dr. Holly
Golightly matched to the American General Hospital. After the Match, the
fellowship program director informed the NRMP that Dr. Golightly had forged
a letter of reference from her residency program director. The NRMP initiated
a violation investigation, collected information from relevant parties
including the program director who purportedly had written the letter
of reference, and determined that Dr. Golightly had forged the letter.
The NRMP permanently identified Dr. Golightly as a match violator in the
NRMP's Registration, Ranking, and Results (R3) System, permanently barred
her from participation in future NRMP matches, sent a copy of the Final
Report to the American Board of Medical Specialties and the Federation
of State Medical Boards, and barred her from NRMP match-participating
programs for one year.
Policy
Section 4.3 of the Specialties
Matching Services Match Participation Agreement states that applicants
are responsible for the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of the
information provided to programs. The submission of information by an
applicant during the interview and/or matching process that is false,
misleading, incomplete, or plagiarized from another source is a violation
of the Agreement. If the NRMP believes it has received credible evidence
that the applicant or program has violated the terms of the Agreement,
the NRMP is authorized to take appropriate action.
Section 7.2 outlines
for applicants and programs the consequences of a confirmed violation
of the Agreement. Applicants may be barred from subsequent NRMP matches
and/or identified as a match violator to participating programs for up
to three years or permanently, as determined by the NRMP.
III. Violation - Applicant and Program
Description
In the 2009 Allergy and Immunology Fellowship Match, Dr. John Doe matched
to the Allergy and Immunology program at American Medical Institution.
In June 2009, Dr. Doe notified the program that he would not honor his
binding match commitment because he had decided to accept a position in
another Allergy and Immunology program with a July 2010 start date. The
program director at the American Medical Institution informed the NRMP
of Dr. Doe's actions, and the NRMP initiated a violation investigation
of Dr. Doe. After learning that the second Allergy and Immunology program
also was an NRMP match-participating program, the NRMP initiated a separate
violation investigation of the program. The NRMP conducted the investigations
according to the NRMP Policies and Procedures
for the Reporting, Investigation, and Disposition of Violations of NRMP
Agreements. Although the program director at the second Allergy and
Immunology program did not know of Dr. Doe's existing match commitment,
the NRMP concluded that a breach of the Agreement had occurred. Dr. Doe
was barred from match-participating programs for one year, flagged as
a match violator in the NRMP's Registration, Ranking, and Results (R3)
System for two years, and barred from future NRMP matches for two years.
In addition, the second Allergy and Immunology program was flagged as
a match violator for two years.
Policy
Section 3.3 of the Specialties
Matching Services Match Participation Agreement states that programs
shall use the Applicant Match History in the Match Site to determine the
match status of any applicant considered for appointment to the program.
Section 5.1 states that
the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order list
or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank order
list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment
if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a breach of the
Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
Section 5.1 also states
that any program that discusses or offers a position to an applicant who
matched to a concurrent year position in another program and who has not
been granted a waiver by the NRMP will be in breach of the Agreement.
Programs shall not interview or discuss with an applicant any potential
position unless the program has first determined that the applicant is
eligible for appointment. Programs shall determine the applicant's eligibility
by verifying the applicant's match status in the Applicant Match History
that is available in the Match Site and/or by calling the NRMP to obtain
that information.
IV. Institution
Description
After the 2009 Combined Musculoskeletal Matching Program, the director
of the Orthopedic Hand Surgery program at National University College
of Medicine contacted the NRMP about an applicant who had declined her
matched position for July 2010. The applicant had informed the program
director that she had accepted a position in a non-match-participating
Plastic Surgery program at another institution beginning July 2010. The
NRMP initiated a violation investigation of the applicant. After learning
that the Plastic Surgery program was affiliated with a match-participating
institution, the NRMP initiated a separate violation investigation of
the institution. The NRMP conducted the investigations according to the
NRMP Policies and Procedures for the Reporting,
Investigation, and Disposition of Violations of NRMP Agreements. Although
the Plastic Surgery program did not participate in the NRMP Matching Program,
the NRMP concluded that the institution had breached the Agreement. The
applicant was barred from match-participating programs for one year, flagged
as a match violator in the NRMP's Registration, Ranking, and Results (R3)
System for two years, and barred from future NRMP matches for two years.
The institution also was listed as a match violator in the Institution
and Program Violations Report in the NRMP Registration, Ranking, and Results
(R3) System.
Policy:
Section 2.2.5 of the Match
Participation Agreement for Institutions requires institution officials
to ensure that none of the programs sponsored by the institution, regardless
of Matching Program participation status, discusses or offers a position
to an applicant who has matched to a concurrent year position through
the Matching Program. An institution will be considered in breach of the
Match Participation Agreement if any program sponsored by the institution
discusses or offers a position to an applicant who has matched to a concurrent
year position in another program.
Section 9.2 of the Match
Participation Agreement for Institutions outlines for applicants, programs,
and institutions the consequences of a confirmed violation of the Agreement.
Updated
08/10/2009
|